Disputes & corrections

Last updated July 22, 2026

The record is meant to be checkable, and challengeable. If you represent a body or organization named here, or you find something wrong, you have a standing right to respond, and we will review it against the public record, correct genuine errors, and publish replies.

Who this is for

• A public body, office, or organization named in a decision or on a wiki page.
• Anyone who spots a factual error, a wrong or dead source, or a decision attributed to the wrong body.
• Anyone who believes a page names a private individual, or otherwise breaches the Terms.

How to raise it

Email pen.artinian@gmail.com with:

• the page or decision (a link is easiest);
• what specifically is wrong or contested;
• where possible, a link to the public record that supports your position;
• if you are replying on behalf of a named body, a note to that effect, we will mark the reply as coming from the named party.

What we do with it

• Factual errors, corrected against the public record, with the change logged so the history is visible.
• Contested readings, a dignity reading grades process and proximity, not correctness. Where a reading is disputed rather than factually wrong, we attach the dispute and your reply to the page so both are visible, instead of quietly overriding one side.
• A page naming a private individual, or another Terms breach, reviewed promptly and removed if substantiated.

What to expect

We aim to acknowledge a correction within a few business days and to resolve clear factual errors quickly. More involved disputes take longer, because we check them against sources rather than simply accept or reject them. This is a small, human-run preview; we will tell you where things stand.

How we name, and why that matters here

UnImpact names accountable public seats and organizations, and links to the public documents that describe them; it is designed not to characterize the private conduct of the individuals who hold those seats, and findings about reused legislative text are findings about text, not about motive. If you believe a page crosses that line, tell us and we will act on it. See the Methodology for how dignity readings are computed and exactly what they do and do not claim.